Pajala

25. marraskuuta 2009

Etusivu Philosophy Day 2006 Kysy filosofilta 2006 Questions

 

In English
Auf Deutsch
En Francais
Hakala
Boahene
Kostet
Kolehmainen
Jukarainen
Ravneberg
Riuttanen
Pajala
Moilanen
Salomaa

 

Tommi Pajala

Mäkelänrinteen lukio

Opettaja Heikki Jäntti

 

1.

 

Every human being thinks about death, birth and other similarly philosophical questions at some point. Therefore it could be said that everyone philosophises to some extent, although the individual in question may not regard his actions as philosophy.

The fact that everyone is a philosopher himself and the fact that most students seems to look down on philosophy, is a very ironical combination. The students are undermining themselves without realising that they are actually the target. This has everything to do with the fact that the essence of philosophy has not been properly brought to people’s attention. Few and far between are those students who have an idea about the function of philosophy – most think of it as pointless rubbish.

Although, it must be said that an idea about the function of philosophy is not essential in being a philosopher. Wittgenstein found philosophy to be purposeless; Nietzsche had a similar attitude with the expectation of his own philosophy – which was the greatest, naturally.

It is true that philosophy develops argumentative techniques, analogical thinking and a critical point of view, but the claim that philosophy is a ‘school of freedom’ is one of a more controversial sort. Generally speaking, philosophy tends to make people think more careful, more frequently and more critically. At first glance this does not seem to have anything to do with freedom. If you are questioning everything in your path, are you not confined to scepticism, though of a milder sort than that pursued by the Pyrrhonian school?

                      By questioning things you create a pattern, and therefore an idea of you as a questioning person, which you thereafter follow. I would claim, however, that you are still more free than you would without philosophy. With philosophy you learn to refuse to accept other views without acceptable arguments and therefore do not readily accept every dogma that is thrown your way.

In philosophy authority can’t be used as an argument. Authoritarian abuse, both physical and mental, has a huge impact on a society, even in the western countries. Without critical thinking, the idea of free will is unreachable and thus one’s rights remain to be unfulfilled. So, it could be said that philosophy is paramount to the fulfilment of human rights.

Philosophy is an abstract concept; it does not develop tools for it is a tool in itself. The teaching of philosophy is not an elevator to heaven – you have to take the stairs and use your head as well. Even though a course of philosophy is mandatory for Finnish high school students, the impact on the thinking of the youngsters has so far remained to be insignificant: students are lectured about the ideas of Plato, Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas but they never understand what the whole point is. This leads back to the unawareness about the function of philosophy. The practical functions of philosophy need to be emphasised more.

A questioning attitude is a valuable asset in life. Constant reflection on one’s values, goals and methods tends to make one a more balanced person. With the help of philosophy more than one ethical point of view can be achieved, thus decreasing racism and other bad things. Philosophy helps avoiding the trap of an egoistic attitude, which to me seems to be one of the greatest sins of the modern world.

 

Etusivu | In English | Auf Deutsch | En Francais | Hakala | Boahene | Kostet | Kolehmainen | Jukarainen | Ravneberg | Riuttanen | Pajala | Moilanen | Salomaa

Tätä sivustoa on viimeksi päivitetty 29. tammikuuta 2007