Riuttanen

25. marraskuuta 2009

Etusivu Philosophy Day 2006 Kysy filosofilta 2006 Questions

 

In English
Auf Deutsch
En Francais
Hakala
Boahene
Kostet
Kolehmainen
Jukarainen
Ravneberg
Riuttanen
Pajala
Moilanen
Salomaa

 

Elina Riuttanen

Vaajakosken lukio

Opettaja Suvi Torkki

 

2. The Pursuit of Happiness

 

Aristotle's virtue ethics has been disregarded in modern ethics. Virtue ethics has its own flaws, naturally, but so do all theories. The good thing about virtue ethics, however, is that it concentrates on life as a whole, not just little fragments of it like most other theories. Life is a neverending pursuit of happiness.

                      According to Aristotle, there are four reasons for the existence of any being: the material, the formal, the moving and the final reason. The problem is, that we cannot know what is, for example, the final reason of man. Aristotle thought it might be happiness, for happiness is the one thing all human beings search for. It is never used as a means of getting something or somewhere. Growing happy, it seems, is our telos (fate), just like growing into an oak might be the telos of an acorn. Happiness is a value in itself.

                      All this raises a question: "By what means can we become happy?" Aristotle defines the conditions under which a person can become happy. First of all one has to have adequate materialistic resources in order to be capable of concentrating on developing his mind. Needless to say, one has to be a man -- unfortunately Aristotle did not consider women capable of happiness. This was due to their inability to control their emotions.

                      Unlike the Stoic thinkers, Aristotle does not dismiss all emotions as futile. As he states in his Nicomachean Ethics, "some desires and pleasures relate to things that are noble and good in kind". By this he means the pleasures of the mind, rather than those of the body. Even in this case, however, pleasure is merely a way of becoming happy.

                      In order to become happy one has to develop one's abilities, both physical and mental. Aristotle also classifies virtues into two categories: the virtues of character and the virtues of reason or intellect. The virtues of reason can be improved by education, the virtues of character by upbringing. By repeating acts considered good one becomes a more virtuous person. Some can do good things because of their strong will, but they cannot become happy. A good person does not have to strive to do good.

                      When all these conditions are attained, in addition to living with moderation and having good social contacts, a person can be defined as happy. The major advantage of this theory is that it gives us something to reach for, an aim. The mere act of searching may be enough to make a person happy. All in all, virtue ethics gives us hope -- there is such a thing as happiness and it can be reached.

 

Etusivu | In English | Auf Deutsch | En Francais | Hakala | Boahene | Kostet | Kolehmainen | Jukarainen | Ravneberg | Riuttanen | Pajala | Moilanen | Salomaa

Tätä sivustoa on viimeksi päivitetty 29. tammikuuta 2007